I was in a client workshop yesterday and we were discussing how brands should approach developing a clear personality and a tone of voice for their social media platforms (Facebook and Twitter, predominantly). My advice has always been this, who do your audience either:
- have the deepest relationship with
- want to have the deepest relationship with
Working out which members of the organisation an audience already have the deepest relationship with or want to have a deeper relationship with can really inform how to develop an organisation’s personality and tone of voice in social media, primarily because they can put those individuals front and centre and let them inform the organisation’s personality/tone of voice by being themselves (and by ‘themselves’ I mean by being the embodiment of their role within the organisation, mixed with their own personality).
Think about it this way: For telcos, their audience almost always have the deepest relationship with the customer service department, hence the huge success of @comcastcares. Similarly, for tech brands, geeky audiences want to have the deepest relationship with the R&D team, so it makes sense to put them front and centre, speaking directly to the audience (e.g. Dell IdeaStorm)
Just a wee thought I wanted to share.
As you were…
Image courtesy of altemark / Mikael Altemark
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Rebeiro. Matt Rebeiro said: RT: @RMM_LDN: Some brief thoughts on developing a brand's personality/tone of voice in social: http://bit.ly/9YutAN Agree? Disagree? [...]
Interesting. Half the battle is truly knowing who your audience is in social media in the first place!
I wonder if tone of voice changes depending on situation. For example, imagine CERN had a massive PR disaster like LHC destroying a small moon (or something).
At the moment, the tone of voice is decided by the mainstream public’s slightly naive fascination with science.
But if CERN had a disaster, surely the mainstream public would want to hear from whoever’s going to solve the destroyed-moon problem.
Do you think then that the tone of voice would shift according to how well/badly the brand is faring in the eyes of the public? Do you think it should?