Matt Rebeiro

Matt helps our clients devise, develop and prototype ideas for social media activities, initiatives and programs.

His specialist subjects include understanding how social media has altered our traditional media consumption habits, as well as the luxury sector, retail and F&B. In addition, Matt also spends time working across the clothing, beauty, property and FMCG sectors.

Matt has been with RMM since 2007 and before that he ran a community radio station and studied Philosophy at the University of Warwick.

Matt mostly likes science fiction, skateboards and scotch eggs.

5 responses to “Social media is the bonfire to advertising fireworks”

  1. Caleb Gardner

    Another problem with this analogy is that people want to see fireworks. I would argue that we rarely want to see advertising. In fact, advertising tends to be annoying at best and intrusive at worst.

    A better analogy might be that social media is the bonfire to advertising’s person sitting alone while the bonfire tries to sell him something.

  2. Karl Long

    I think it’s a great analogy, but I believe advertising still has an important role to play in igniting the bonfires :) Advertising as a discipline is not something that is going to be replaced by social communication, but it’s role is going to change. Rather than encouraging passive consumption advertising can become something that motivates participation in a the bigger idea. I wrote a post some time ago titled “is advertising worth saving” where I argue this point, i’d appreciate any comments or feedback.
    http://experiencecurve.com/archives/is-advertising-worth-saving

    Cheers

    @karllong

  3. Matt Rebeiro

    Karl I very much agree that advertising can help ignite a bonfire. It’s not the only way to start a bonfire but depending on the scope of a given bonfire, sometimes it needs a ‘firework’ to get it started.

    The point here is very much that bonfires are a distinct activity from traditional advertising and can speak to more than just marketing functions within a business (whereas fireworks almost exclusively are the preserve of marketing and specifically advertising).

    As such you’re right, I believe advertising as a discipline is not something that is going to be replaced by social communcation. However, and I imagine you’d guessed as much, bonfires are all about social communication – they require social technologies to work.

    Therein lies what could possibly be the fundamental difference beween bonfires and fireworks: Bonfires NEED a social technology (or technologies) to underpin them; Fireworks do not require (but might occassionally be supported by) a social technology (or technologies).

    **(Apologies for the slow reply – i’ve been in The Alps this past week enjoy the rather lovely snow Europe is currently enjoying!)

  4. New things to use/do in 2011 | Paul Armstrong (@munkyfonkey)

    [...] DO: More research/demographics reading – This really is the future of the comms industry. If you don’t know who’s using what, when and why. You are essentially loading a shotgun every time you recommend something to a client. Sometimes doing something because you want to be first is great and the right thing for the client but as budgets get tighter and people are stretched further and further – looking for the flashy will be left to the big guns to trailblaze.  Think less fireworks and more bonfire stoking. [...]

  5. PR, Public Relations & communications news and features

    [...] DO: More research/demographics reading – This really is the future of the comms industry. If you don't know who's using what, when and why. You are essentially loading a shotgun every time you recommend something to a client. Sometimes doing something because you want to be first is great and the right thing for the client but as budgets get tighter and people are stretched further and further – looking for the flashy will be left to the big guns to trailblaze.  Think less fireworks and more bonfire stoking. [...]

Leave a Reply